SZLNL v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 869

SZLNL v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 869

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant’s grounds were without substance, lacked any prospect of success, and there was no special reason to extend time for filing. The Tribunal made no jurisdictional error.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
11 June 2008
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'leave to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'leave to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal against the interlocutory judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court should be granted' 'Whether the applicant established any jurisdictional error in the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal' 'Whether an extension of time should be granted to file the application for leave to appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant’s grounds were without substance, lacked any prospect of success, and there was no special reason to extend time for filing. The Tribunal made no jurisdictional error.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.']