SZLNX v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1754
The lack of merit in the proposed grounds of appeal means no 'special reasons' exist to justify extension of time to appeal; allegations of denial of natural justice, bad faith, or excess of jurisdiction are unsupported; the Tribunal’s actions were open to it on the information before it; country information did not fall within s424A(1); application is dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'judicial Review' 'natural Justice' 'tribunal Decision Making']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant has 'special reasons' warranting extension of time to appeal" 'Whether the Tribunal denied the applicant procedural fairness or natural justice' 'Whether Tribunal acted in excess of jurisdiction or identified a wrong issue' 'Whether Tribunal failed to accord natural justice under s424A of Migration Act']
Ratio Decidendi
The lack of merit in the proposed grounds of appeal means no 'special reasons' exist to justify extension of time to appeal; allegations of denial of natural justice, bad faith, or excess of jurisdiction are unsupported; the Tribunal’s actions were open to it on the information before it; country information did not fall within s424A(1); application is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' 'The Applicant pay the costs of the First Respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment