SZLRL v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 716
Leave to appeal was refused because there was no jurisdictional error, breach of procedural fairness or denial of natural justice in the Tribunal's and Federal Magistrates Court's decisions. The proposed grounds of appeal are broad generalisations unsupported by evidence, and the decisions are not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration by the Full Court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decision of Federal Magistrates Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Decisions' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decision of Federal Magistrates Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal from an interlocutory decision of the Federal Magistrates Court should be granted' 'Whether the Federal Magistrates Court erred in dismissing the application for review of the Refugee Review Tribunal decision' 'Whether there was jurisdictional error, breach of procedural fairness or denial of natural justice']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because there was no jurisdictional error, breach of procedural fairness or denial of natural justice in the Tribunal's and Federal Magistrates Court's decisions. The proposed grounds of appeal are broad generalisations unsupported by evidence, and the decisions are not attended by sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration by the Full Court.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The Application for Leave to Appeal be dismissed.' 'The Applicant to pay the costs of the First Respondent fixed in the sum of $800.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment