SZLTL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1096

SZLTL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1096

Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed grounds were unparticularised and meaningless, and raised matters not reviewable by the Court, with no sufficient doubt attending the Federal Magistrate's decision.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory (leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court)
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Interlocutory (leave to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from a decision dismissing an application for judicial review of a Tribunal decision refusing a protection visa' "Whether the applicant's grounds of appeal are sufficiently particularised to justify leave to appeal" "Whether the Federal Magistrate's decision involved reviewable legal or jurisdictional error"]

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed grounds were unparticularised and meaningless, and raised matters not reviewable by the Court, with no sufficient doubt attending the Federal Magistrate's decision.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant is ordered to pay the first respondent's costs of the application fixed in the sum of $2,500.00."]