SZLYD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1748

SZLYD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1748

The appeal was dismissed because the Tribunal correctly applied s 424A(3)(ba) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), as the application for review commenced after the legislative amendment came into effect, and the Federal Magistrate did not err in finding that the Tribunal gave proper, genuine, and realistic consideration to the appellant's claims and evidence.

Parties
Appellant: SZLYD; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 November 2008
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Protection Visa, Judicial Review, Migration Act 1958 (cth), Tribunal Procedure, Adverse Credibility Finding
Migration Law Protection Visa Judicial Review Migration Act 1958 (cth) Tribunal Procedure Adverse Credibility Finding

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZLYD

Appellant

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

First Respondent

Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in applying s 424A(3)(ba) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to give proper, genuine and realistic consideration to the appellant's claims and evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the Tribunal correctly applied s 424A(3)(ba) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), as the application for review commenced after the legislative amendment came into effect, and the Federal Magistrate did not err in finding that the Tribunal gave proper, genuine, and realistic consideration to the appellant's claims and evidence.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The appellant is to pay the costs of the first respondent in the sum of $2,400.00.