SZLZF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1728

SZLZF v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1728

The appellant failed to demonstrate special reasons for the extension of time to appeal; there was no explanation for the delay and no reason to doubt the correctness of the Federal Magistrates Court's decision.

Parties
Appellant: SZLZF; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 November 2008
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time (appeal) / Federal Court – Determination of Application for Extension of Time to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court
Outcome
Application for extension of time dismissed. Appellant ordered to pay first respondent's costs.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Extension of Time, Protection Visas, Credibility of Applicants, Refugees Convention

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZLZF

Appellant

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

First Respondent

Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time (appeal) / Federal Court – Determination of Application for Extension of Time to Appeal From Federal Magistrates Court

  1. 1 Whether special reasons existed to justify an extension of time for filing a notice of appeal
  2. 2 Whether the Federal Magistrates Court erred in dismissing application for judicial review of Refugee Review Tribunal decision

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant failed to demonstrate special reasons for the extension of time to appeal; there was no explanation for the delay and no reason to doubt the correctness of the Federal Magistrates Court's decision.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed. Appellant ordered to pay first respondent's costs.

Orders

  • The application for extension of time be dismissed.
  • The appellant pay the first respondent's costs.