SZMAM v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1287
Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed grounds did not identify any jurisdictional error or error by the Federal Magistrates Court, the Federal Magistrates Court was clearly correct to dismiss the judicial review application as raising no arguable case, and granting leave would be futile.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 August 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Federal Court Application for Leave to Appeal From Dismissal of Federal Magistrates Court Judicial Review Application
- Outcome
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'natural Justice' 'leave to Appeal' 'interlocutory Decision' 'credibility Findings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Federal Court Application for Leave to Appeal From Dismissal of Federal Magistrates Court Judicial Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Magistrates Court dismissal of the judicial review application.' 'Whether the applicant identified any jurisdictional error by the Refugee Review Tribunal or error by the Federal Magistrates Court.' 'Whether the applicant had any basis to have his protection visa claims put again to the Refugee Review Tribunal.']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the proposed grounds did not identify any jurisdictional error or error by the Federal Magistrates Court, the Federal Magistrates Court was clearly correct to dismiss the judicial review application as raising no arguable case, and granting leave would be futile.
Court Disposition
The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment