SZMBH v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 1242

SZMBH v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2008] FCA 1242

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant identified no specific error in the Federal Magistrates Court's reasons and no jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, conceded that the Tribunal had not made a legal error, and the decision below was not attended with sufficient doubt nor would substantial injustice result from refusing leave.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 August 2008
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrates Court Judgment Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Judgment' 'judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'no Arguable Case' 'refugees Convention Nexus' 'jurisdictional Error']
['migration Law' 'refugee Law' 'administrative Law' 'appellate Procedure'] ['leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Judgment' 'judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision' 'no Arguable Case' 'refugees Convention Nexus' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal From a Federal Magistrates Court Judgment Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision / Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the interlocutory judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court' 'Whether the judgment below was attended with sufficient doubt to warrant reconsideration on appeal' 'Whether substantial injustice would result if leave were refused' 'Whether the applicant identified any jurisdictional error by the Refugee Review Tribunal']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant identified no specific error in the Federal Magistrates Court's reasons and no jurisdictional error by the Tribunal, conceded that the Tribunal had not made a legal error, and the decision below was not attended with sufficient doubt nor would substantial injustice result from refusing leave.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of the application for leave to appeal, fixed at $800."]