SZNNG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 92

SZNNG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 92

The applicant did not provide an arguable basis for appeal or evidence of jurisdictional error or bias; thus, granting an extension of time would be futile and is refused.

Parties
Applicant: SZNNG; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 February 2010
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Judicial Review, Bias, Protection Visa, Jurisdictional Error
Administrative Law Migration Law Extension of Time Judicial Review Bias Protection Visa Jurisdictional Error

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZNNG

Applicant

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship

First Respondent

Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an extension of time to file an appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the decision of the Tribunal was affected by actual or apprehended bias
  3. 3 Whether there was any jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not provide an arguable basis for appeal or evidence of jurisdictional error or bias; thus, granting an extension of time would be futile and is refused.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for extension of time within which to file and serve a notice of appeal be dismissed.
  • The applicant pay the first respondent's costs.