SZOWL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 551
The applicant failed to establish a sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the Federal Magistrate's decision or any error of law or denial of procedural fairness. The grounds of appeal merely reiterated his claims but did not identify any legal error. Leave to appeal was refused, and the application dismissed with costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'leave to Appeal' 'protection Visa' 'procedural Fairness' 'interlocutory Appeals']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether leave should be granted to appeal the interlocutory decision dismissing the application for judicial review of the Refugee Review Tribunal's decision" 'Whether there was a jurisdictional error or denial of procedural fairness by the Tribunal or the Federal Magistrate']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish a sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the Federal Magistrate's decision or any error of law or denial of procedural fairness. The grounds of appeal merely reiterated his claims but did not identify any legal error. Leave to appeal was refused, and the application dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment