SZOWN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 906

SZOWN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FCA 906

The Tribunal's findings concerning credibility and the interpretation of documentary evidence were open on the material supplied; no jurisdictional error or procedural unfairness was established. The enforcement of China's One-Child Policy is a law of general application and does not amount to persecution under the Refugee Convention. Thus, the appeal fails.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 August 2011
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'credibility Assessment']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'credibility Assessment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal committed a jurisdictional error' 'Whether the Tribunal denied procedural fairness' "Whether enforcement of China's One-Child Policy constitutes persecution for a Convention reason" "Whether the Tribunal's assessment of evidence demonstrated bias or discrimination"]

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's findings concerning credibility and the interpretation of documentary evidence were open on the material supplied; no jurisdictional error or procedural unfairness was established. The enforcement of China's One-Child Policy is a law of general application and does not amount to persecution under the Refugee Convention. Thus, the appeal fails.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs."]