SZQGY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 187

There is no realistic prospect that an appeal would succeed, as the grounds of appeal do not identify any jurisdictional error in the judgment of the FMCA, nor in the reviewer's decision regarding procedural fairness.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 06 March 2012
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome: Application for extension of time dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics: ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']

['migration Law' 'practice and Procedure'] ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether there is a jurisdictional error in the judgment of the Federal Magistrates Court' 'Whether the reasons provided by the Reviewer were logical or rational' 'Whether denial of procedural fairness occurred']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed with costs.

Orders

['The application for an extension of time in which to appeal, filed on 5 January 2012, is dismissed with costs.']