SZQQA v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1310
The appellant's evidence and the purported court order did not constitute 'information' within s 424A(1)(a), and the court order fell within the exception in s 424A(3)(b). No error was shown in the approach of the Circuit Court judge, accordingly the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['section 424 a Migration Act' 'protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'administrative Law' 'tribunal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to comply with s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' "Whether information constituted 'information' falling within s 424A(1)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)" 'Whether the exception in s 424A(3)(b) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applied']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's evidence and the purported court order did not constitute 'information' within s 424A(1)(a), and the court order fell within the exception in s 424A(3)(b). No error was shown in the approach of the Circuit Court judge, accordingly the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment