SZQTG v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 895
Because the first respondent's affidavit evidence showed actual costs of about $3,740.50 and an estimated recoverable amount on taxation of about $2,431, and because the nature of the proceedings made a fixed costs order appropriate, the Court fixed the costs recoverable from the appellant at $2,431.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Determination of Fixed Costs After Dismissal of Appeal
- Outcome
- Fixed costs order granted in favour of the first respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['determination of Fixed Costs' 'affidavit Evidence' 'costs Recoverable on Taxation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia / Determination of Fixed Costs After Dismissal of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should make a determination of fixed costs in favour of the first respondent.' 'Whether leave should be granted to the first respondent to file the affidavit of Ms Bulut sworn 20 August 2012.']
Ratio Decidendi
Because the first respondent's affidavit evidence showed actual costs of about $3,740.50 and an estimated recoverable amount on taxation of about $2,431, and because the nature of the proceedings made a fixed costs order appropriate, the Court fixed the costs recoverable from the appellant at $2,431.
Court Disposition
Fixed costs order granted in favour of the first respondent.
Orders
- ['The costs which the first respondent may recover from the applicant be in the sum of $2,431.' 'Leave be granted to the first respondent to file in Court the affidavit of Ms Bulut sworn 20 August 2012.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment