SZRFR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1743

SZRFR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1743

The applicant did not satisfy the legal requirements for the visa due to not lodging within the specified time after ceasing to hold a substantive visa; explanation for delay was not acceptable, and the proposed appeal lacked merit.

Parties
Applicant: SZRFR; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Visa Criteria, Judicial Review
Migration Law Administrative Law Extension of Time Visa Criteria Judicial Review

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZRFR

Applicant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether an extension of time to appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's proposed appeal has prospects of success
  3. 3 Whether the applicant provided an acceptable explanation for delay

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not satisfy the legal requirements for the visa due to not lodging within the specified time after ceasing to hold a substantive visa; explanation for delay was not acceptable, and the proposed appeal lacked merit.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for an extension of time, filed on 31 May 2018, be dismissed.
  • The applicant pay the first respondent's costs.