SZRPL v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 1198
There was no jurisdictional error by the Tribunal in the notification or handling of complementary protection grounds, nor in relation to consideration or reliance upon country information; the grounds of appeal failed and the Federal Circuit Court made no error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment of the Federal Court of Australia on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'complementary Protection' 'refugee Status' 'significant Harm']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment of the Federal Court of Australia on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to clearly explain the complementary protection criteria to the appellant and the distinction between migration law and complementary protection under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to take country information into account regarding political violence in Bangladesh']
Ratio Decidendi
There was no jurisdictional error by the Tribunal in the notification or handling of complementary protection grounds, nor in relation to consideration or reliance upon country information; the grounds of appeal failed and the Federal Circuit Court made no error.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent of and incidental to the appeal.' "The title of the first respondent be amended to 'Minister for Immigration and Border Protection'."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment