SZSJG v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1155
The appellant failed to demonstrate appellable error or jurisdictional error in the Federal Circuit Court's and the Tribunal's decisions; the grounds on appeal merely sought to re-argue the merits, which is impermissible in this jurisdiction.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['judicial Review' 'protection Visa' 'refugee Status Determination' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in fact finding in a manner that was illogical, irrational, or without evidence' "Whether the Tribunal misunderstood or incorrectly applied the test for 'well-founded fear of persecution' for a Convention reason" "Whether the Tribunal failed to consider all essential elements of the appellant's claim"]
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant failed to demonstrate appellable error or jurisdictional error in the Federal Circuit Court's and the Tribunal's decisions; the grounds on appeal merely sought to re-argue the merits, which is impermissible in this jurisdiction.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ["The name of the first respondent be changed from 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship' to 'Minister for Immigration and Border Protection'." 'Leave be granted to the first respondent to file in Court the affidavit of Reuben Reyes Ray affirmed on 4 November 2013.' 'The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment