SZSLD v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2013] FCA 547

The applicant failed to identify any arguable error or demonstrate the primary judge's decision was attended by sufficient doubt to warrant the grant of leave to appeal; thus, leave was refused.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 04 June 2013
Procedural Posture: Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics: ['application for Leave to Appeal' 'protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Assessment']

['migration'] ['application for Leave to Appeal' 'protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Assessment']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted' 'Whether there was a jurisdictional error in the RRT decision' 'Whether the primary judge erred in finding no arguable case']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to identify any arguable error or demonstrate the primary judge's decision was attended by sufficient doubt to warrant the grant of leave to appeal; thus, leave was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal refused

Orders

['The application for leave to appeal is refused.' "The applicant pay the respondents' costs as agreed or assessed."]