SZSLH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 501
The application for an extension of time was refused because, despite the notice of appeal being only five days late, the proposed appeal lacked merit: the Federal Court found no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision and no appealable error in the Federal Circuit Court judgment, and the proposed grounds appeared to challenge only the merits of the Tribunal's decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time Within Which to Seek Leave to Appeal From a Judgment of the Federal Circuit Court / Federal Court Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal Merits Review' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'extension of Time to Appeal' 'natural Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time Within Which to Seek Leave to Appeal From a Judgment of the Federal Circuit Court / Federal Court Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether time should be extended for the applicant to file a notice of appeal from the Federal Circuit Court judgment dated 31 January 2014.' "Whether the proposed appeal had sufficient merit, including whether the Tribunal's decision involved jurisdictional error and whether the Federal Circuit Court judgment involved appealable error."]
Ratio Decidendi
The application for an extension of time was refused because, despite the notice of appeal being only five days late, the proposed appeal lacked merit: the Federal Court found no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision and no appealable error in the Federal Circuit Court judgment, and the proposed grounds appeared to challenge only the merits of the Tribunal's decision.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed.
Orders
- ['The application for an extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal from the judgment of the Federal Circuit Court dated 31 January 2014 is dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent Minister's costs of the application."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment