SZSRU v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1252
The Tribunal considered all material claims, applied the correct 'real chance' standard for refugee status, did not wrongly apply a balance of probabilities test, appropriately distinguished SZQPA on the facts, and did not err in its application of s 91R(2)(a); accordingly, no appealable error was shown and the appeal was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'standard of Proof' 'complementary Protection' 'serious Harm' 'particular Social Group' 'judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal failed to deal with all of the appellant's claims" 'Whether the Tribunal applied the correct standard of proof' 'Whether the primary judge erred in making a factual assumption distinguishing SZQPA' "Whether the Tribunal applied the wrong test for 'serious harm' under s 91R(2)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal considered all material claims, applied the correct 'real chance' standard for refugee status, did not wrongly apply a balance of probabilities test, appropriately distinguished SZQPA on the facts, and did not err in its application of s 91R(2)(a); accordingly, no appealable error was shown and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment