SZSTK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1266

SZSTK v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1266

There was no appellable error by the Federal Circuit Court in dismissing the application for judicial review as the appellant's grounds failed to disclose jurisdictional error or legal error in the Tribunal's assessment of the complementary protection claims.

Parties
Appellant: SZSTK; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Complementary Protection, Judicial Review, Protection Visa
Migration Complementary Protection Judicial Review Protection Visa

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZSTK

Appellant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From the Federal Circuit Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in finding the Refugee Review Tribunal assessed complementary protection claims according to law

Ratio Decidendi

There was no appellable error by the Federal Circuit Court in dismissing the application for judicial review as the appellant's grounds failed to disclose jurisdictional error or legal error in the Tribunal's assessment of the complementary protection claims.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The name of the first respondent be changed to 'Minister for Immigration and Border Protection'.
  • The appeal is dismissed.