SZSUE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 639

SZSUE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 639

The Tribunal did not commit jurisdictional error; it considered all aspects of the appellant's claims and found there was no risk that the individuals involved in the incident would harm the appellant if he was returned to Sri Lanka. Therefore, there were no substantial grounds to believe he would face significant harm upon removal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 June 2014
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing of Appeal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'judicial Review']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'jurisdictional Error' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment After Hearing of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to consider a claim or integer of a claim amounting to jurisdictional error' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to consider whether the appellant was owed complementary protection under s 36(2)(aa) of the Migration Act 1958']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not commit jurisdictional error; it considered all aspects of the appellant's claims and found there was no risk that the individuals involved in the incident would harm the appellant if he was returned to Sri Lanka. Therefore, there were no substantial grounds to believe he would face significant harm upon removal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs."]