SZSXT v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2013] FCA 1416
The orders were made ex parte and instanter because the applicant's removal was imminent, and without the injunction, any application for leave to appeal would be rendered futile. The urgency and balance of convenience justified granting the orders under s 23 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory
- Outcome
- Ex parte orders granted restraining removal; orders made as a matter of urgency.
- Legal Topics
- ['injunction Against Removal' 'interlocutory Relief' 'ex Parte Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Urgent Interlocutory Application / Interlocutory
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether ex parte injunction should be granted to prevent imminent removal of applicant' 'Whether urgent interlocutory orders were justified to avoid injustice']
Ratio Decidendi
The orders were made ex parte and instanter because the applicant's removal was imminent, and without the injunction, any application for leave to appeal would be rendered futile. The urgency and balance of convenience justified granting the orders under s 23 of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Ex parte orders granted restraining removal; orders made as a matter of urgency.
Orders
- ['The First Respondent be restrained from taking any steps to remove the Applicant from Australia until 4.00 pm on 20 December 2013 or until further order.' 'Any application for leave to appeal be filed and served by noon on 18 December 2013.' 'Liberty to apply.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment