SZSYI v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2015] FCA 1276

SZSYI v Minister for Immigration & Border Protection [2015] FCA 1276

The Tribunal did not conclude that the applicants had abandoned any aspect of their factual claims as relevant to complementary protection. No separate or additional factual claims were asserted specifically for complementary protection, but the Tribunal made express findings on risk. The Tribunal, and the primary judge, engaged with the complementary protection provisions as required, and there was insufficient prospect of success to grant the extension of time.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 November 2015
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'complementary Protection' 'protection Visas' 'judicial Review']
['migration Law'] ['extension of Time' 'complementary Protection' 'protection Visas' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in holding that the second applicant had made no claim for complementary protection' 'Whether the Tribunal considered if the applicants had a claim under complementary protection' 'Whether there was jurisdictional error by the Tribunal or the primary judge' 'Whether the applicants were denied procedural fairness in the Tribunal or the Federal Circuit Court']

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not conclude that the applicants had abandoned any aspect of their factual claims as relevant to complementary protection. No separate or additional factual claims were asserted specifically for complementary protection, but the Tribunal made express findings on risk. The Tribunal, and the primary judge, engaged with the complementary protection provisions as required, and there was insufficient prospect of success to grant the extension of time.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time be dismissed.' "The applicants pay the first respondent's costs."]