SZSZR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 821
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant did not identify any arguable error by the primary judge; the Tribunal applied the correct legal tests and made findings of fact reasonably open to it. No jurisdictional error or breach of natural justice was established.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZSZR; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Refugee Review Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 05 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal From Summary Dismissal in the Federal Circuit Court
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Summary Dismissal, Jurisdictional Error, Natural Justice, Migration Law, Protection Visa
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZSZR
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Refugee Review Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Dismissal of Application for Leave to Appeal From Summary Dismissal in the Federal Circuit Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in summarily dismissing the applicant's judicial review application
- 2 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to apply the correct test regarding harm for returnees to Sri Lanka
- 3 Whether jurisdictional error or breach of natural justice occurred
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant did not identify any arguable error by the primary judge; the Tribunal applied the correct legal tests and made findings of fact reasonably open to it. No jurisdictional error or breach of natural justice was established.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.
- The applicant is to pay the first respondent's costs in the amount of $4,113.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment