SZTGU v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 859
None of the appellant's grounds establish jurisdictional error by the Tribunal or Federal Circuit Court; the Tribunal was entitled to test evidence and found the appellant not credible with adequate reasons; leave to raise new grounds on appeal refused and appeal dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'credibility Assessment' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal's approach gave rise to an appearance of bias" 'Whether the Tribunal denied the appellant procedural fairness' 'Whether the Tribunal made findings based on no evidence or failed to provide adequate reasons']
Ratio Decidendi
None of the appellant's grounds establish jurisdictional error by the Tribunal or Federal Circuit Court; the Tribunal was entitled to test evidence and found the appellant not credible with adequate reasons; leave to raise new grounds on appeal refused and appeal dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' 'The appellant pay the costs of the first respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment