SZTHT v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 100

SZTHT v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 100

The Federal Circuit Court correctly concluded there was no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision and no appealable error has been identified; neither of the grounds relied on by the appellant is made out.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
17 February 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['jurisdictional Error' 'apprehended Bias' 'protection Visa' 'judicial Review']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['jurisdictional Error' 'apprehended Bias' 'protection Visa' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Tribunal failed to carry out its statutory duty under the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 36' "Whether the Tribunal's decision was affected by apprehended bias"]

Ratio Decidendi

The Federal Circuit Court correctly concluded there was no jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision and no appealable error has been identified; neither of the grounds relied on by the appellant is made out.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, as agreed or taxed."]