SZTIS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 545
The Tribunal satisfied its obligations under s 425(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) as the issue of bail and remand upon return was raised by the Delegate and acknowledged prior to the Tribunal hearing; the provision of further DFAT information post-hearing did not raise a new dispositive issue requiring a further hearing. Leave to raise the new ground was granted, but the appeal was dismissed as the alleged failure under s 425(1) was not established.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal With Leave Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs
- Legal Topics
- ['protection (class Xa) Visa' 'procedural Fairness' 'section 425 of Migration Act' 'appeals Procedures']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal With Leave Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Tribunal failed to comply with s 425 of the Migration Act by not inviting the appellant to appear regarding the bail guarantor issue after new country information was provided post-hearing' 'Whether leave should be granted to raise a new ground of appeal not considered by the primary judge']
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal satisfied its obligations under s 425(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) as the issue of bail and remand upon return was raised by the Delegate and acknowledged prior to the Tribunal hearing; the provision of further DFAT information post-hearing did not raise a new dispositive issue requiring a further hearing. Leave to raise the new ground was granted, but the appeal was dismissed as the alleged failure under s 425(1) was not established.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs
Orders
- ['Leave granted for appellant to rely on ground 1 in draft notice of appeal dated 6 April 2016.' 'Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment