SZTLI v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1181
There are no arguable grounds to suggest that the orders of the Federal Circuit Court Judge were attended by sufficient doubt, nor any jurisdictional error by the Tribunal. The statutory scheme allows the Tribunal to proceed in the absence of the applicant and there is no substantiated allegation of bias or unfairness.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'bias']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether extension of time and leave to appeal should be granted against Federal Circuit Court's dismissal" 'Whether there was jurisdictional error by Refugee Review Tribunal' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to act fairly or was biased against the appellant' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in summarily dismissing the application for review']
Ratio Decidendi
There are no arguable grounds to suggest that the orders of the Federal Circuit Court Judge were attended by sufficient doubt, nor any jurisdictional error by the Tribunal. The statutory scheme allows the Tribunal to proceed in the absence of the applicant and there is no substantiated allegation of bias or unfairness.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The appellant to pay the minister's costs of the application, fixed in the sum of $2500."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment