SZUHH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCA 1194

The applicant failed to identify or substantiate any jurisdictional error by the Refugee Review Tribunal or the Federal Circuit Court, and his arguments were directed to the merits rather than legal error. No reasonable prospect exists of jurisdictional error emerging upon appeal. The application for leave and extension of time must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 07 November 2014
Procedural Posture: Migration Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time
Outcome: Application for leave to appeal and extension of time dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics: ['leave to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'fixed Costs']

['migration'] ['leave to Appeal' 'jurisdictional Error' 'procedural Fairness' 'fixed Costs']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether leave to appeal and an extension of time should be granted' 'Whether the applicant established jurisdictional error by the Refugee Review Tribunal' 'Whether the Federal Circuit Court denied procedural fairness' 'Appropriate costs order in migration appeal']

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal and extension of time dismissed with costs.

Orders

['The application for leave to appeal and an extension of time in which to seek leave to appeal be dismissed with costs, fixed at $1,756.']