SZUJJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 137

SZUJJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 137

The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient doubt about the correctness of the judgment below or that substantial injustice would arise if leave to appeal were refused; no arguable grounds of appeal identified; the application for extension of time and leave to appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['protection (class Xa) Visa' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['protection (class Xa) Visa' 'extension of Time' 'leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether applicant should be granted extension of time to seek leave to appeal' 'Whether applicant should be granted leave to appeal from Federal Circuit Court judgment']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to demonstrate sufficient doubt about the correctness of the judgment below or that substantial injustice would arise if leave to appeal were refused; no arguable grounds of appeal identified; the application for extension of time and leave to appeal must therefore be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for extension of time and leave to appeal filed on 27 September 2016 be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs as agreed or taxed."]