SZUOV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1420

SZUOV v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1420

The Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision as the application was filed outside the statutory time limit, and this jurisdictional bar could not be relaxed or extended. Therefore, the Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of the judicial review application was correct, making the extension of time application futile.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
30 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Appeal / Federal Court – Application Decided
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['extension of Time' 'jurisdiction of Tribunal' 'protection Visa' 'judicial Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to File a Notice of Appeal / Federal Court – Application Decided

  1. 1 ['Whether an extension of time to appeal from Federal Circuit Court is warranted' "Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction to review delegate's decision" "Whether the applicant's late filing could be excused"]

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to review the delegate's decision as the application was filed outside the statutory time limit, and this jurisdictional bar could not be relaxed or extended. Therefore, the Federal Circuit Court's dismissal of the judicial review application was correct, making the extension of time application futile.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application for an extension of time filed on 10 March 2017 is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the application filed on 10 March 2017 fixed in the sum of $3,230."]