SZUUP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 857

SZUUP v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 857

The applicant failed to establish jurisdictional error in the Federal Circuit Court's refusal to extend time. His grounds addressed matters concerning the Tribunal decision or the Federal Circuit Court's assessment of his explanation for delay, but any such asserted error did not show that the Federal Circuit Court misconceived its function or powers. The Court below correctly identified and applied the questions under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), and no jurisdictional error was apparent.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Migration Judicial Review / Application for Judicial Review of a Federal Circuit Court Decision Refusing an Extension of Time Under S 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)
Outcome
Application dismissed; Federal Circuit Court of Australia joined as third respondent; applicant ordered to pay the Minister's costs as agreed or assessed.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'extension of Time' 'jurisdictional Error' 'federal Circuit Court Decision' 's 39 B Judiciary Act Jurisdiction']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Judicial Review / Application for Judicial Review of a Federal Circuit Court Decision Refusing an Extension of Time Under S 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (cth)

  1. 1 ["Whether the Federal Court had jurisdiction to review the Federal Circuit Court's refusal to extend time under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth)." "Whether the applicant established jurisdictional error in the Federal Circuit Court's decision refusing an extension of time." "Whether alleged errors concerning the Tribunal decision or the applicant's explanation for delay could establish reviewable error in the Federal Circuit Court decision."]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant failed to establish jurisdictional error in the Federal Circuit Court's refusal to extend time. His grounds addressed matters concerning the Tribunal decision or the Federal Circuit Court's assessment of his explanation for delay, but any such asserted error did not show that the Federal Circuit Court misconceived its function or powers. The Court below correctly identified and applied the questions under s 477(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth), and no jurisdictional error was apparent.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed; Federal Circuit Court of Australia joined as third respondent; applicant ordered to pay the Minister's costs as agreed or assessed.

Orders

  • ['The Federal Circuit Court of Australia be joined as the third respondent to the proceedings.' 'The application is dismissed.' "The applicant is to pay the Minister's costs as agreed or as assessed."]