SZVBB v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1414
It was open to the Tribunal, and not capricious or unreasonable, to conclude that the oral evidence of the applicant's proposed witnesses would not affect its adverse assessment of the applicant's credibility, given the extent and nature of the inconsistencies in the applicant's evidence. Therefore, there was no jurisdictional error.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'tribunal Procedure' 'jurisdictional Error' 'credibility Assessment' 'oral Evidence From Overseas Witnesses']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Tribunal erred in refusing to obtain telephone evidence from overseas witnesses' "Whether the Tribunal's decision not to obtain oral evidence was capricious or unreasonable" 'Whether the Tribunal failed to address claims in the way they were made' "Whether there was jurisdictional error in the Tribunal's decision-making"]
Ratio Decidendi
It was open to the Tribunal, and not capricious or unreasonable, to conclude that the oral evidence of the applicant's proposed witnesses would not affect its adverse assessment of the applicant's credibility, given the extent and nature of the inconsistencies in the applicant's evidence. Therefore, there was no jurisdictional error.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment