SZVCZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 130

SZVCZ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 130

The appeal failed because the Asserted Information was neutral information about prominent Pakistani leaders associated with Christian schools and did not, in its terms, reject, deny or undermine the appellant's protection claims so as to enliven s 424A(1). In any event, it was not specifically about Prime Minister Sharif or the two provincial governors as individuals, but was about a class of prominent leaders, and therefore fell within the exception in s 424A(3)(a). The Tribunal was not obliged under s 424A to provide the written particulars contended for, and no error by the primary judge was established.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
18 August 2017
Procedural Posture
Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judicial Review Decision Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia From SZVCZ V Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2840
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'section 424 a Information Disclosure Obligation' 'information Specifically About a Person or About a Class of Persons' 'jurisdictional Error']
['migration Law' 'administrative Law' 'judicial Review'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'section 424 a Information Disclosure Obligation' 'information Specifically About a Person or About a Class of Persons' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Appeal From Federal Circuit Court Judicial Review Decision Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia From SZVCZ V Minister for Immigration & Anor [2016] FCCA 2840

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the primary judge erred in finding that the Asserted Information was not information within s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' 'Whether, if the Asserted Information was information within s 424A(1), it fell within the exception in s 424A(3)(a) because it was not specifically about the appellant or another person and was just about a class of persons.' 'Whether the Tribunal was required to give the appellant written particulars of the Asserted Information and invite comment under s 424A.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal failed because the Asserted Information was neutral information about prominent Pakistani leaders associated with Christian schools and did not, in its terms, reject, deny or undermine the appellant's protection claims so as to enliven s 424A(1). In any event, it was not specifically about Prime Minister Sharif or the two provincial governors as individuals, but was about a class of prominent leaders, and therefore fell within the exception in s 424A(3)(a). The Tribunal was not obliged under s 424A to provide the written particulars contended for, and no error by the primary judge was established.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs."]