SZVED v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2017] FCA 395

SZVED v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2017] FCA 395

The Court was satisfied that $3,200 represented a reasonable sum for costs recoverable by the first respondent and ordered costs in that amount, applying s 43(3)(d) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 April 2017
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Order Following Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
Costs awarded to first respondent, fixed at $3,200
Legal Topics
['costs' 'appeals']
['administrative Law' 'constitutional Law' 'human Rights'] ['costs' 'appeals']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Costs Order Following Dismissal of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether costs should be awarded in a specified sum pursuant to s 43(3)(d) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)']

Ratio Decidendi

The Court was satisfied that $3,200 represented a reasonable sum for costs recoverable by the first respondent and ordered costs in that amount, applying s 43(3)(d) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).

Court Disposition

Costs awarded to first respondent, fixed at $3,200

Orders

  • ["The appellant pay the first respondent's costs of the appeal, fixed pursuant to section 43(3)(d) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) in the sum of $3,200."]