SZVEE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 300
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable grounds or sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the primary judge’s determination dismissing the judicial review application. The applicant’s contentions were bare assertions without substance, and the Tribunal’s adverse credibility finding was open and supported by reasons. No error in procedure or law was identified.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 February 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal is refused; costs ordered against applicant.
- Legal Topics
- ['leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'procedural Fairness' 'adverse Credibility Findings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted for the dismissal of a judicial review application concerning a protection visa refusal' 'Whether the Tribunal denied procedural fairness to the applicant' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to consider risk of harm and protection in India']
Ratio Decidendi
Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable grounds or sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the primary judge’s determination dismissing the judicial review application. The applicant’s contentions were bare assertions without substance, and the Tribunal’s adverse credibility finding was open and supported by reasons. No error in procedure or law was identified.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal is refused; costs ordered against applicant.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal is refused.' "The applicant pay the Minister's costs as agreed or taxed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment