SZVEE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 300

SZVEE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 300

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable grounds or sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the primary judge’s determination dismissing the judicial review application. The applicant’s contentions were bare assertions without substance, and the Tribunal’s adverse credibility finding was open and supported by reasons. No error in procedure or law was identified.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal is refused; costs ordered against applicant.
Legal Topics
['leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'protection Visas' 'procedural Fairness' 'adverse Credibility Findings']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal should be granted for the dismissal of a judicial review application concerning a protection visa refusal' 'Whether the Tribunal denied procedural fairness to the applicant' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to consider risk of harm and protection in India']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant failed to demonstrate any arguable grounds or sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the primary judge’s determination dismissing the judicial review application. The applicant’s contentions were bare assertions without substance, and the Tribunal’s adverse credibility finding was open and supported by reasons. No error in procedure or law was identified.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal is refused; costs ordered against applicant.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal is refused.' "The applicant pay the Minister's costs as agreed or taxed."]