SZVEL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 1287
The application for extension of time to seek leave to appeal was dismissed because the appeal was without merit: there was no denial of natural justice in the Tribunal process, no jurisdictional error, the review application to the Tribunal was lodged out of time, and the exercise of discretion in refusing an adjournment disclosed no appealable error.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZVEL; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time to Seek Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Judicial Review, Extension of Time Applications, Procedural Fairness, Jurisdiction of Tribunal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZVEL
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Seek Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extension of time to seek leave to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether there was a denial of natural justice in the Tribunal's processes
- 3 Whether the Tribunal had jurisdiction in light of the out-of-time review application
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time to seek leave to appeal was dismissed because the appeal was without merit: there was no denial of natural justice in the Tribunal process, no jurisdictional error, the review application to the Tribunal was lodged out of time, and the exercise of discretion in refusing an adjournment disclosed no appealable error.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for an extension of time within which to seek leave to appeal dated 3 July 2017 be dismissed.
- The applicant pay the first respondent's costs of and incidental to the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment