SZVID v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1383

SZVID v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 1383

The appellant's grounds were unparticularised and were not made out. His submissions did not identify error in the Federal Circuit Court judgment, legal error by the Tribunal, denial of procedural fairness or natural justice, non-compliance with s 424A(1), or apprehended bias. Section 423A did not apply to his 2012 protection visa application. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
03 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia
Outcome
Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'apprehended Bias' 'complementary Protection' 'jurisdictional Error']
['migration' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'natural Justice' 'apprehended Bias' 'complementary Protection' 'jurisdictional Error']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Dismissal of Application for Judicial Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of Protection Visa / Appeal to the Federal Court of Australia

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Federal Circuit Court erred in dismissing the appellant's judicial review application concerning the Refugee Review Tribunal decision." 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal denied procedural fairness or natural justice or failed to follow proper procedure.' "Whether s 423A of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) applied to the appellant's protection visa application." 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal complied with s 424A(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth).' 'Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to bring an impartial mind to the review.']

Ratio Decidendi

The appellant's grounds were unparticularised and were not made out. His submissions did not identify error in the Federal Circuit Court judgment, legal error by the Tribunal, denial of procedural fairness or natural justice, non-compliance with s 424A(1), or apprehended bias. Section 423A did not apply to his 2012 protection visa application. The appeal was therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.' 'The Appellant is to the pay the costs of the First Respondent of or incidental to the appeal to be taxed or agreed.']