SZVXS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 641

SZVXS v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2016] FCA 641

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's proposed grounds repeated the grounds advanced in the Federal Circuit Court, were unsupported by evidence or particulars, and did not show sufficient error, sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the decision below, or any prospect of a successful appeal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From an Interlocutory Decision of the Federal Circuit Court Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'bias' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'arguable Case']
['migration' 'administrative Law'] ['leave to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'procedural Fairness' 'bias' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'arguable Case']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Migration Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal From an Interlocutory Decision of the Federal Circuit Court Dismissing an Application for Judicial Review of a Refugee Review Tribunal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether leave to appeal should be granted from the Federal Circuit Court's interlocutory dismissal of the judicial review application" "Whether the proposed grounds alleging denial of procedural fairness, bias, and insufficient time to answer questions showed sufficient error in the Federal Circuit Court's decision" "Whether there was sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the Federal Circuit Court's decision and substantial injustice if leave were refused"]

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was refused because the applicant's proposed grounds repeated the grounds advanced in the Federal Circuit Court, were unsupported by evidence or particulars, and did not show sufficient error, sufficient doubt as to the correctness of the decision below, or any prospect of a successful appeal.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed with costs.']