SZWBQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 344

SZWBQ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 344

There was no jurisdictional error by the primary judge or the Tribunal; the Tribunal had considered the claim regarding harm upon return to the village, and fresh evidence was not admissible on appeal.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
05 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['jurisdictional Error' 'fresh Evidence' 'persecution' 'complementary Protection' 'tribunal Review']
['administrative Law' 'migration Law' 'human Rights Law'] ['jurisdictional Error' 'fresh Evidence' 'persecution' 'complementary Protection' 'tribunal Review']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Tribunal failed to consider integer of claim regarding harm upon return to village' 'Whether fresh evidence is permitted on appeal' 'Whether there was jurisdictional error']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no jurisdictional error by the primary judge or the Tribunal; the Tribunal had considered the claim regarding harm upon return to the village, and fresh evidence was not admissible on appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal be dismissed.' "The appellant pay the first respondent's costs, to be assessed if not agreed."]