SZWDE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 368

SZWDE v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 368

The application for an extension of time to appeal was dismissed as the applicant failed to demonstrate an arguable case that the Tribunal committed jurisdictional error or failed to consider his claims. Delay was explained but absent any error in the primary judgment or Tribunal, extension would be futile.

Parties
Applicant: SZWDE; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Decision on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Jurisdictional Error, Procedural Fairness, Protection Visa, Particular Social Group
Migration Law Extension of Time Jurisdictional Error Procedural Fairness Protection Visa Particular Social Group

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZWDE

Applicant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Decision on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Court should grant an extension of time to appeal
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicant's claims or mischaracterised the social group
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal misdirected itself or asked the wrong question regarding the applicant's Tamil background

Ratio Decidendi

The application for an extension of time to appeal was dismissed as the applicant failed to demonstrate an arguable case that the Tribunal committed jurisdictional error or failed to consider his claims. Delay was explained but absent any error in the primary judgment or Tribunal, extension would be futile.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application be dismissed.
  • The applicant pay the first respondent's costs.