SZWDH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2015] FCA 1382
The applicant's grounds for appeal do not demonstrate prospects of success; the Refugee Review Tribunal's reasoning is not illogical or irrational, and the absence of further particularised grounds renders the proposed appeal futile. Therefore, the extension of time in which to appeal should be refused.
- Parties
- Applicant: SZWDH; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Migration / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time to Appeal, Judicial Review, Protection Visa, Jurisdictional Error
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
SZWDH
Applicant
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
First Respondent
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Migration / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an extension of time to appeal should be granted
- 2 Whether the proposed appeal has prospects of success
- 3 Whether the decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal was illogical or irrational
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's grounds for appeal do not demonstrate prospects of success; the Refugee Review Tribunal's reasoning is not illogical or irrational, and the absence of further particularised grounds renders the proposed appeal futile. Therefore, the extension of time in which to appeal should be refused.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- The Applicant's application for an extension of time in which to appeal be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment