SZWDN v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 278

SZWDN v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 278

No legal or jurisdictional error was found in the Federal Circuit Court's or the Tribunal's decisions, as the Tribunal considered the substance of all claims, relied on appropriate country information, and followed established legal principles in its assessment of refugee and complementary protection claims.

Parties
Appellant: SZWDN; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration and Border Protection; Second Respondent: Administrative Appeals Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Refugee Status, Complementary Protection, Procedural Fairness
Administrative Law Immigration Law Human Rights Law Judicial Review Refugee Status Complementary Protection Procedural Fairness

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SZWDN

Appellant

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection

First Respondent

Administrative Appeals Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider all integers of the applicant's claims
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal took into account irrelevant considerations
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal made jurisdictional error in handling persecution and complementary protection claims

Ratio Decidendi

No legal or jurisdictional error was found in the Federal Circuit Court's or the Tribunal's decisions, as the Tribunal considered the substance of all claims, relied on appropriate country information, and followed established legal principles in its assessment of refugee and complementary protection claims.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal be dismissed.
  • The appellant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $3,000.