T A Robinson and Sons Pty Ltd v Haylor [1957] HCA 76
There is no inconsistency within s. 109 of the Constitution between the Footwear Manufacturing Industry Award 1951 and the Long Service Leave Act 1955 (N.S.W.) as the award is silent on long service leave, therefore the State Act applies to persons bound by that award. The doctrine of inconsistency covers only the...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: T. A. Robinson & Sons Pty. Ltd.; Respondent: Walter Norman Haylor
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court of Australia, Appeal by Special Leave From the Chief Industrial Magistrate at Sydney
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- Inconsistency Between Federal and State Laws, Effect of Commonwealth Awards on State Industrial Laws, Long Service Leave Entitlements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T. A. Robinson & Sons Pty. Ltd.
Appellant
Walter Norman Haylor
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court of Australia, Appeal by Special Leave From the Chief Industrial Magistrate at Sydney
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Long Service Leave Act 1955 (N.S.W.) is inconsistent with the Footwear Manufacturing Industry Award 1951 under s. 109 of the Constitution, thereby invalid to the extent of inconsistency.
- 2 Whether the silence of the Commonwealth award on long service leave excludes the operation of the State Act.
Ratio Decidendi
There is no inconsistency within s. 109 of the Constitution between the Footwear Manufacturing Industry Award 1951 and the Long Service Leave Act 1955 (N.S.W.) as the award is silent on long service leave, therefore the State Act applies to persons bound by that award. The doctrine of inconsistency covers only the express provisions of an award, not its omissions nor its reasons.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment