Thompson v Fitzalan [2007] NSWLEC 262

Thompson v Fitzalan [2007] NSWLEC 262

The application was dismissed because the Court was satisfied that the tree showed no present risk of structural failure or unusual structural defects, that the clothesline area did not create a significant risk of injury given its limited use, and that there was no significant past or present damage or significant risk of immediate future damage from the tree's roots sufficient to satisfy the statutory tests for intervention.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 May 2007
Procedural Posture
Neighbour Application Under S 7 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Extempore Judgment After Hearing and View
Outcome
Application dismissed.
Legal Topics
['neighbouring Trees' 'risk of Injury From Branch Drop' 'root Damage' 'dividing Fence Distortion' 'dismissal of Tree Intervention Application']
['trees Disputes' 'property Law' 'land and Environment Court Proceedings'] ['neighbouring Trees' 'risk of Injury From Branch Drop' 'root Damage' 'dividing Fence Distortion' 'dismissal of Tree Intervention Application']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Neighbour Application Under S 7 of the Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Extempore Judgment After Hearing and View

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the lemon scented gum on the respondent's property posed a significant risk of injury to persons on the applicant's property." "Whether roots or branches from the tree had caused, were causing, or were likely in the immediate future to cause significant damage to the applicant's property." 'Whether intervention with respect to the main structure of the tree was warranted under s 10 (2)(a) and (b) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006.' 'Whether a distorted panel of the dividing fence should be rectified without damaging or interfering with the tree or its roots.']

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the Court was satisfied that the tree showed no present risk of structural failure or unusual structural defects, that the clothesline area did not create a significant risk of injury given its limited use, and that there was no significant past or present damage or significant risk of immediate future damage from the tree's roots sufficient to satisfy the statutory tests for intervention.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.']