T & M Industries Pty Ltd v Inspector James [2007] NSWIRComm 85

T & M Industries Pty Ltd v Inspector James [2007] NSWIRComm 85

Her Honour at first instance correctly found the offences serious, applied proper sentencing principles including objective seriousness, deterrence, totality, and means to pay, and, despite the applicant’s arguments regarding subjective factors and financial means, the severity of the sentence was within the...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 April 2007
Procedural Posture
Criminal (occupational Health and Safety) Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (severity of Penalty) From First Instance Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'workplace Safety' 'duty of Care' 'totality Principle' 'foreseeability of Risk']
['occupational Health and Safety' 'criminal Law' 'industrial Law'] ['sentencing' 'workplace Safety' 'duty of Care' 'totality Principle' 'foreseeability of Risk']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal (occupational Health and Safety) Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence (severity of Penalty) From First Instance Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the fines imposed at first instance under Occupational Health & Safety Act 1983/2000 were manifestly unjust or inordinately harsh' 'Whether the sentencing judge failed to properly consider relevant subjective and objective factors, including financial circumstances and totality' 'Whether the comparison with penalties in similar cases justified appellate intervention']

Ratio Decidendi

Her Honour at first instance correctly found the offences serious, applied proper sentencing principles including objective seriousness, deterrence, totality, and means to pay, and, despite the applicant’s arguments regarding subjective factors and financial means, the severity of the sentence was within the appropriate range so no error warranting appellate intervention was demonstrated. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed.']