REGINA v TA [2003] NSWCCA 191

REGINA v TA [2003] NSWCCA 191

The complainant’s opinion as to whether she appeared to consent on video was inadmissible, being irrelevant; the conviction appeal was dismissed as the jury’s verdict was reasonable given the evidence; the sentencing appeal succeeded due to improper structuring and accumulation of concurrent sentences contrary to Pearce, warranting substituted sentences with adjusted commencement dates and lengths.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 July 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Conviction appeal dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal allowed; sentences quashed and substituted; parole eligibility set.
Legal Topics
['sexual Assault' 'evidence' 'sentencing' 'consent' 'drug Administration in Criminal Conduct']
['criminal Law'] ['sexual Assault' 'evidence' 'sentencing' 'consent' 'drug Administration in Criminal Conduct']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Criminal Appeal, Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Admissibility of complainant’s opinion on consent as depicted in videotaped evidence' 'Whether the jury’s verdict was unreasonable given the evidence' 'Application of sentencing principles, including loss of professional status and totality principle under Pearce']

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant’s opinion as to whether she appeared to consent on video was inadmissible, being irrelevant; the conviction appeal was dismissed as the jury’s verdict was reasonable given the evidence; the sentencing appeal succeeded due to improper structuring and accumulation of concurrent sentences contrary to Pearce, warranting substituted sentences with adjusted commencement dates and lengths.

Court Disposition

Conviction appeal dismissed; leave to appeal against sentence granted; appeal allowed; sentences quashed and substituted; parole eligibility set.

Orders

  • ['On count 2: five years imprisonment from 16 February 2000 to 15 February 2005' 'On count 1: four years imprisonment from 16 February 2004 to 15 February 2008' 'On count 3: six months imprisonment from 16 February 2004 to 15 August 2004' 'Eligible for parole release on 15 February 2006']