Application by Tabcorp Holdings Limited [2017] ACompT 1
The Tribunal was satisfied that, in all the circumstances, the merger of Tabcorp and Tatts would result in substantial public benefits—including cost savings, revenue increases, industry synergies, and enhanced competitiveness—while any public detriment or risk of lessening competition was either unlikely, sufficiently addressed by the agreed divestment of Odyssey Gaming in Queensland, or not material. Therefore, the acquisition should be authorised, subject to Tabcorp providing an undertaking regarding Odyssey Gaming.
- Parties
- Applicant: Tabcorp Holdings Limited; Intervener: Tatts Group Limited; Respondent: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; Intervener: CrownBet Pty Ltd; Intervener: Racing Victoria Limited; Intervener: Harness Racing Victoria; Intervener: Greyhound Racing Victoria; Intervener: Racing.Com Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Authorisation / Final Determination
- Outcome
- authorisation granted (merger approved with conditions)
- Legal Topics
- Merger Authorisation, Net Public Benefits Test, Market Definition, Vertical Integration, Licensing, Racing Media Rights, EGM Services, Lottery and Keno Services
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tabcorp Holdings Limited
Applicant
Tatts Group Limited
Intervener
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
Respondent
CrownBet Pty Ltd
Intervener
Racing Victoria Limited
Intervener
Harness Racing Victoria
Intervener
Greyhound Racing Victoria
Intervener
Racing.Com Pty Ltd
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Merger Authorisation / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed acquisition by Tabcorp Holdings Limited of Tatts Group Limited should be authorised under s 95AT of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
- 2 Whether the merger would result in such a benefit to the public that the acquisition should be allowed to occur under s 95AZH
- 3 Whether the acquisition would result in a substantial lessening of competition in relevant markets
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was satisfied that, in all the circumstances, the merger of Tabcorp and Tatts would result in substantial public benefits—including cost savings, revenue increases, industry synergies, and enhanced competitiveness—while any public detriment or risk of lessening competition was either unlikely, sufficiently addressed by the agreed divestment of Odyssey Gaming in Queensland, or not material. Therefore, the acquisition should be authorised, subject to Tabcorp providing an undertaking regarding Odyssey Gaming.
Court Disposition
authorisation granted (merger approved with conditions)
Orders
- Tabcorp Holdings Limited is granted authorisation pursuant to s 95AT and s 95AZJ of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) to acquire shares in Tatts Group Limited as per the Merger Implementation Deed.
- The authorisation is subject to the condition that Tabcorp provide to the ACCC an undertaking under s 87B relating to the divestment of Odyssey Gaming in Queensland.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment