Application by Tabcorp Holdings Limited [2017] ACompT 1

Application by Tabcorp Holdings Limited [2017] ACompT 1

The Tribunal was satisfied that, in all the circumstances, the merger of Tabcorp and Tatts would result in substantial public benefits—including cost savings, revenue increases, industry synergies, and enhanced competitiveness—while any public detriment or risk of lessening competition was either unlikely, sufficiently addressed by the agreed divestment of Odyssey Gaming in Queensland, or not material. Therefore, the acquisition should be authorised, subject to Tabcorp providing an undertaking regarding Odyssey Gaming.

Parties
Applicant: Tabcorp Holdings Limited; Intervener: Tatts Group Limited; Respondent: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission; Intervener: CrownBet Pty Ltd; Intervener: Racing Victoria Limited; Intervener: Harness Racing Victoria; Intervener: Greyhound Racing Victoria; Intervener: Racing.Com Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 June 2017
Procedural Posture
Merger Authorisation / Final Determination
Outcome
authorisation granted (merger approved with conditions)
Legal Topics
Merger Authorisation, Net Public Benefits Test, Market Definition, Vertical Integration, Licensing, Racing Media Rights, EGM Services, Lottery and Keno Services

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 16
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tabcorp Holdings Limited

Applicant

Tatts Group Limited

Intervener

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission

Respondent

CrownBet Pty Ltd

Intervener

Racing Victoria Limited

Intervener

Harness Racing Victoria

Intervener

Greyhound Racing Victoria

Intervener

Racing.Com Pty Ltd

Intervener

Procedural Posture

Merger Authorisation / Final Determination

  1. 1 Whether the proposed acquisition by Tabcorp Holdings Limited of Tatts Group Limited should be authorised under s 95AT of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)
  2. 2 Whether the merger would result in such a benefit to the public that the acquisition should be allowed to occur under s 95AZH
  3. 3 Whether the acquisition would result in a substantial lessening of competition in relevant markets

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal was satisfied that, in all the circumstances, the merger of Tabcorp and Tatts would result in substantial public benefits—including cost savings, revenue increases, industry synergies, and enhanced competitiveness—while any public detriment or risk of lessening competition was either unlikely, sufficiently addressed by the agreed divestment of Odyssey Gaming in Queensland, or not material. Therefore, the acquisition should be authorised, subject to Tabcorp providing an undertaking regarding Odyssey Gaming.

Court Disposition

authorisation granted (merger approved with conditions)

Orders

  • Tabcorp Holdings Limited is granted authorisation pursuant to s 95AT and s 95AZJ of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) to acquire shares in Tatts Group Limited as per the Merger Implementation Deed.
  • The authorisation is subject to the condition that Tabcorp provide to the ACCC an undertaking under s 87B relating to the divestment of Odyssey Gaming in Queensland.