Williams t/as Select Stables v Mead [2024] NSWCATAP 211

Williams t/as Select Stables v Mead [2024] NSWCATAP 211

The appeal was dismissed and leave to appeal refused because the appellant failed to comply with Tribunal directions to provide a recording or transcript from the first instance hearing, making it impossible to assess the alleged errors or establish a basis for granting leave to appeal.

Parties
Appellant: Taelar Rae Williams t/as Select Stables; Respondent: Carla Mead
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
25 October 2024
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determination
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeals, Leave to Appeal, Procedural Fairness, Contract Interpretation, Costs
Administrative Law Civil Procedure Consumer Law Appeals Leave to Appeal Procedural Fairness Contract Interpretation Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Taelar Rae Williams t/as Select Stables

Appellant

Carla Mead

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Appeal Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal's decision was not fair and equitable
  3. 3 Whether the decision was against the weight of the evidence

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed and leave to appeal refused because the appellant failed to comply with Tribunal directions to provide a recording or transcript from the first instance hearing, making it impossible to assess the alleged errors or establish a basis for granting leave to appeal.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused; appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is refused.
  • The appeal is otherwise dismissed.